Generating content intended for publication

In principle, AI-generated content should be cited in the same way as other references in scholarly publications, i.e. in the form of a citation. This can be done in the text or in a footnote or endnote as well as within the reference list. However, it should be noted that AI-generated content is not a source in the scientific sense.

In addition, a description in the introduction or in the methods section may be appropriate. In special cases, more extensive chat histories with AI tools can also be documented as an appendix or supplement.

The publisher reserves the right to include a corresponding reference to the use of AI tools in the metadata of a publication.

Generating content not intended for publication

The use of AI tools should also be described transparently for content not intended for publication, such as for internal communication between the submitter and the publisher (e.g. abstract, synopsis). It is recommended that the information is also provided here in the form of citations.

Furthermore, the use of AI tools in the production process by editors should be described transparently. For journals, it is recommended that the information is provided on the journal's website. For books, the publisher reserves the right to provide the information on the publisher's website.

However, the use of AI tools in the review process is not permitted, as the confidentiality of submissions cannot be guaranteed. Furthermore, the reviewers are fully responsible for the content of their reviews. In particular, it should be noted that a text protected by copyright or licensing law (even in part) may not be used as an input in a commercial or freely accessible AI tool without the consent of the respective rights holder.